https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 Whose issue is it anyway? The effects of leader gender and equality message framing on men's and women's mobilisation towards workplace gender equality https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:35441 women's issue, which limits men's (non-target's) involvement in the movement, or a meritocratic non-issue that exists due to women's (target's) tendency to pursue less intensive careers. In contrast to such work focusing on women's experiences as targets of discrimination or men's role in preserving inequality, we propose a solidarity-based approach that positions men and women as agents of change. This approach relies on two processes: leadership processes - particularly leadership as a form of influence based on shared identities among leaders and followers (e.g., their gender group); and political solidarity as a way to mobilise the silent majority (men) to work as allies beside a minority (women) and embrace equality as a common cause for both groups. In two experiments (Ns=338, 336) we studied how leader gender and message framing affect men's and women's support for equality by contrasting a solidarity-based framing of gender equality as a common cause for men and women, with a women's issue frame (Experiment 1) or a meritocratic frame (Experiment 2). The statement was attributed to a male or female leader (Experiments 1-2) or, additionally, to a government agency (Experiment 1). Women reported higher sense of common cause (Experiment 2) and collective action intentions than men (Experiments 1-2), and higher intentions under common cause compared to meritocracy frames (Experiment 2). Interestingly, male leaders invoked higher sense of common cause and collective action intentions for both men and women regardless of framing (Experiment 2). Irrespective of leader gender however, as predicted common cause framing boosted perceived leader prototypicality, legitimacy, and influence across the board (Experiments 1-2). Yet this was qualified by women (compared to men) rating leaders as more legitimate and influential under common cause compared to meritocracy framing (Experiment 2). Women's reactions to equality messages, and the intersection of leadership and solidarity towards equality are discussed.]]> Wed 20 Jan 2021 17:22:05 AEDT ]]> With great power comes great responsibility: Repositioning gender (in)equality as men's burden or men's responsibility https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:44800 Wed 13 Mar 2024 08:07:43 AEDT ]]> Understanding the impact of gender-based violence on access to and participation in higher education https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:39760 Mon 27 Jun 2022 18:28:59 AEST ]]>